IEEEXtreme 19.0 Appeal — Public Audit Record

This page provides a public, neutral audit record for the IEEEXtreme 19.0 appeal packet. It is intended to enable independent verification of document integrity without requiring reliance on participant testimony.

Status Table

Record	Status	Date (UTC)	Notes
APPEAL_LOCK_2026-02-08	Locked	2026-02-08	Record locked after v2.2 build
Packet v2.2	Current	2026-02-08	Manifest v1.6
Packet v2.1	Superseded	2026-02-08	Manifest v1.5
Packet v2.0	Superseded	2026-02-08	Manifest v1.4
Baseline v1.0	Frozen	2026-02-07	Evidence packet ZIP frozen

Current Release

Packet: IEEEXtreme19_Appeal_Packet_v2.2.pdf
Packet Source: IEEEXtreme19_Appeal_Packet_v2.2.md
Manifest: 00_EXECUTIVE/manifest.json (v1.6)

Download the Evidence Packet

Evidence Packet (PDF): IEEEXtreme19_Appeal_Packet_v2.2.pdf
Superseded packet (v2.1): IEEEXtreme19_Appeal_Packet_v2.1.pdf
CANONICAL URL: https://timothywheels.com/downloads/appeal/IEEEXtreme19_Appeal_Packet_v2.2.pdf

Integrity Check

Packet v2.2 SHA-256: 6615fd6768b08caba7ec8114f87ace7440afcc9e13b08ba4aee4aadc970d874f
E-017A SHA-256: 9ca99a7564295ec5575285a34a96eac352243b762ff66ed4883fd91902caa792
Full file hashes are recorded in 00_EXECUTIVE/manifest.json inside the packet.
RULE_REF: IEEEXtreme 19.0 Competition Rules §4.2 (AI Usage & Assistance)

Packet Integrity

Release	Manifest	Status	Summary
v2.2	v1.6	Current	Table rendering fix (split manifest)
v2.1	v1.5	Superseded	CSV quoting fix, hash regeneration
v2.0	v1.4	Superseded	Pre-fix packet

Version History

v1.0 (2026-02-07): Frozen baseline evidence ZIP
v2.0 (2026-02-08): Packet updated, Manifest v1.4
v2.1 (2026-02-08): CSV quoting fix, hashes regenerated, count reconciliation, Manifest v1.5
v2.2 (2026-02-08): Manifest table rendering fix (split table), Manifest v1.6

E-017A Verification

sha256sum "01_EVENT_WINDOW/E-017A_identify_graph_functions_verbatim.md"

Expected hash:

9ca99a7564295ec5575285a34a96eac352243b762ff66ed4883fd91902caa792

Notes on Scope

Evidence is limited to system-generated records and disclosed gaps.
No fabricated artifacts are included.
Counts reconcile to JSON source, including image-only messages.

Reviewer Resources

Contact

For verification questions or additional context:
Timothy I. Wheels — timothywheelspro@gmail.com

Contingency Responses

Contingency Responses — IEEE Appeal Scenarios This page provides prepared, neutral responses mapped to common institutional reply patterns. Each scenario includes a calibrated reply and a recommended next action. Scenario 1 — No Response / Silence Response: We are following up on our appeal submission and request confirmation of receipt. The evidence packet is versioned, hash-verified, and available for independent review. Please confirm the review timeline or the appropriate contact for status. ...

How to Read This Packet in 20 Minutes

How to Read This Packet in 20 Minutes This guide is designed for institutional reviewers, ombudsmen, or external auditors to reach an independent assessment without relying on participant testimony. Phase 1 — Orientation (3 minutes) What to read: Section 1 (Cover Letter) What to look for: scope, claims, and the requested action Key questions: What is being requested? What is explicitly not being claimed? Phase 2 — The Critical Exhibit (5 minutes) What to read: Section 5 (E-017A Verbatim Dialogue Summary) What to look for: message breakdown, image-only messages, no code generation Key questions: Does the transcript show conceptual guidance only? Are counts reconciled to JSON source? ...

IEEEXtreme 19.0 Appeal — Public Audit Record#

Status Table#

Current Release#

Download the Evidence Packet#

Integrity Check#

Packet Integrity#

Version History#

E-017A Verification#

Notes on Scope#

Reviewer Resources#

Contact#